Sunday 31 Jan 2016 - 14:59 Makkah mean time-21-4-1437
South Carolina, (IINA) - The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) in a statement on Friday, called on the South Carolina General Assembly to drop an unconstitutional, anti-Islam bill (H. 3521), which is currently moved at the body, because it violates the establishment clause of the U.S. constitution.
The bill's sponsors, and the text of the legislation, make clear it is designed to attack the religious principles of Islam, or “Shariah.”
The bill, sponsored by Republican Rep. Chip Limehouse, came one step closer to becoming law after it passed 68-42 in the South Carolina House of Representatives yesterday. H. 3521 seeks “to prevent a court or other enforcement authority from enforcing foreign law including, but not limited to, Shariah law in this state from a forum outside of the United States or its territories under certain circumstances.”
Even the bill’s sponsors admit that there are no known cases of attorneys in South Carolina attempting to use international law or Shariah law in that state’s courts.
H. 3521 is one of many so-called “foreign law” bills introduced in state legislatures nationwide in a coordinated campaign to demonize Islam and to marginalize American Muslims. In 2015, more than 30 pieces of such legislation were introduced in 17 states.
In a letter sent to South Carolina Senate Majority Leader Harvey S. Peeler, Jr., Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Larry A. Martin and South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson, CAIR Senior Staff Attorney William Burgess wrote in part:
“I write to inform you that H. 3521, adopted on Thursday by the South Carolina House of Representatives, and currently pending before the South Carolina Senate, would if passed be in violation of the Establishment Clause of the United States Constitution. .
“This legislation is very similar to the Oklahoma anti-Sharia constitutional amendment that was struck down as a violation of the Establishment Clause in a federal court challenge brought by CAIR.
Deciding in favor of CAIR’s lawsuit challenging the amendment, U.S. District Judge Vicki Miles-LaGrange ruled that ‘the references to Sharia Law violated the Establishment Clause.’ Should this legislation become law, I expect that it would meet the same fate.
“As with the Oklahoma amendment, H. 3521 would send the unconstitutional message that Islam is an officially disfavored religion in the State of South Carolina. This would be in clear violation of the First Amendment’s command that government remain neutral in matters of religion.”
In 2011, the American Bar Association (ABA) passed a resolution opposing legislation like H. 3521, noting that it is "duplicative of safeguards that are already enshrined in federal and state law," saying, "Initiatives that target an entire religion or stigmatize an entire religious community, such as those explicitly aimed at 'Sharia law,' are inconsistent with some of the core principles and ideals of American jurisprudence."
CAIR noted that the bill’s sponsor has cited the Center for Security Policy (CSP) as a source of the legislation. In 2010, the FBI stated that CSP research is based on "outdated information" and "overstated" any threat Muslim observances pose to America.
CSP’s founder and president, Frank Gaffney, was also referred to by Chris Matthews of MSNBC's Hardball as "one of the country's leading anti-Muslim conspiracy theorists." Gaffney's conspiracy theories regarding Muslim infiltration of all aspects of American life are so overblown that he was banned from attending the Conservative Political Action Conference in 2011 after accusing its top leadership of being infiltrated by Islamists.
SM/IINA
This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://ift.tt/jcXqJW.
No comments:
Post a Comment